home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson)
- Message-ID: <4gidr8$86n@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
- X-Original-Date: 22 Feb 1996 18:49:12 GMT
- Path: in1.uu.net!bounce-back
- Date: 22 Feb 96 20:21:07 GMT
- Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Explicit? What's that?
- Organization: Comp Sci, University of Melbourne
- References: <4gg7df$76c@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu> <4gg8p5$lcq@engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM>
- X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++
- iQBFAgUBMSzQP+EDnX0m9pzZAQEJ9QGAhFIwhP9WA4t5w0etQA4Xj0OQbtOno9ru
- eMxCMafzTx17hEDkZTOrHBiwGdH5Qv88
- =LrrS
-
- clamage@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Clamage) writes:
-
- >The only advantage I can see for an "explicit" conversion operator is
- >that a name for a complicated type, especially one involving pointers
- >or references, might be inconvenient and not intuitive. In that
- >case you might prefer to be able to cast to char**& instead of thinking
- >up a name for that type.
-
- `explicit' conversion operations might be useful in templates.
- They would make it easy for a template to work both with data types
- that have an explicit conversion operator and also with data types
- which just use an implicit conversion operator.
-
- --
- Fergus Henderson WWW: http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh
- fjh@cs.mu.oz.au PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3
- ---
- [ To submit articles: try just posting with your news-reader.
- If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu
- FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html
- Policy: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html
- Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.
- ]
-